<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Death of a Feature: The Impending Demise of Tags</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.rescuetime.com/2009/06/29/death-of-a-feature-the-impending-demise-of-tags/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.rescuetime.com/2009/06/29/death-of-a-feature-the-impending-demise-of-tags/</link>
	<description>Our official blog, where we discuss product updates, general productivity tips, and interesting tidbits from our hundreds of millions of hours of attention data.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 04:10:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Terrible attitude to customers courtesy RescueTime &#171; Kindle Review &#8211; Kindle 2 Review, Books</title>
		<link>http://blog.rescuetime.com/2009/06/29/death-of-a-feature-the-impending-demise-of-tags/#comment-1400</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrible attitude to customers courtesy RescueTime &#171; Kindle Review &#8211; Kindle 2 Review, Books</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 00:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rescuetime.com/?p=217#comment-1400</guid>
		<description>[...] Their blog post explaining this change is a masterpiece of &#8216;this world revolves around us&#8217; and &#8216;who cares about customers&#8217; - [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Their blog post explaining this change is a masterpiece of &#8216;this world revolves around us&#8217; and &#8216;who cares about customers&#8217; &#8211; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abhi</title>
		<link>http://blog.rescuetime.com/2009/06/29/death-of-a-feature-the-impending-demise-of-tags/#comment-1399</link>
		<dc:creator>abhi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 23:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rescuetime.com/?p=217#comment-1399</guid>
		<description>this is a terrible change. 
what happens to all my tags and all the time i&#039;ve spent building up the system?

can i pay to keep tags or the old tagged data i had? 

resucetime has gone from my favorite time management site/app to wtf.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is a terrible change.<br />
what happens to all my tags and all the time i&#8217;ve spent building up the system?</p>
<p>can i pay to keep tags or the old tagged data i had? </p>
<p>resucetime has gone from my favorite time management site/app to wtf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Wright</title>
		<link>http://blog.rescuetime.com/2009/06/29/death-of-a-feature-the-impending-demise-of-tags/#comment-1392</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rescuetime.com/?p=217#comment-1392</guid>
		<description>Hey Matthew!  The subjective-style tagging capability is now built into scores (and we have defaults scores for most things based on your tags and the scores of other users, but you can override them).  I can&#039;t help you if you&#039;ve truly lost interest, but you could check out our new &quot;Total Time by Productivity&quot; visualizations, which we think are awesome: http://www.rescuetime.com/browse/productivity/by/rank/for/the/week/of/2009-07-21

To make sure your scores are pretty accurate, you could browse down this list (list of all apps/sites for the month) and just double-check the scores on the right.   Change any you disagree with and you&#039;ll pretty much have what you had before (and more!).  I&#039;d wager it&#039;d take you (at MOST) 5-10 minutes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Matthew!  The subjective-style tagging capability is now built into scores (and we have defaults scores for most things based on your tags and the scores of other users, but you can override them).  I can&#8217;t help you if you&#8217;ve truly lost interest, but you could check out our new &#8220;Total Time by Productivity&#8221; visualizations, which we think are awesome: <a href="http://www.rescuetime.com/browse/productivity/by/rank/for/the/week/of/2009-07-21" rel="nofollow">http://www.rescuetime.com/browse/productivity/by/rank/for/the/week/of/2009-07-21</a></p>
<p>To make sure your scores are pretty accurate, you could browse down this list (list of all apps/sites for the month) and just double-check the scores on the right.   Change any you disagree with and you&#8217;ll pretty much have what you had before (and more!).  I&#8217;d wager it&#8217;d take you (at MOST) 5-10 minutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lupin_sansei</title>
		<link>http://blog.rescuetime.com/2009/06/29/death-of-a-feature-the-impending-demise-of-tags/#comment-1391</link>
		<dc:creator>lupin_sansei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 07:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rescuetime.com/?p=217#comment-1391</guid>
		<description>I miss tags too. 

I had 3 very broad tags: work, non-work, and productivity. I classified everything into those 3, and had rules saying I had to do so many hours work a day, and less than so much non-work. By removing tags RescueTime has lost me one year&#039;s worth of classifications and I&#039;ve kind of lost interest in learning how to make the categories work for me this way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I miss tags too. </p>
<p>I had 3 very broad tags: work, non-work, and productivity. I classified everything into those 3, and had rules saying I had to do so many hours work a day, and less than so much non-work. By removing tags RescueTime has lost me one year&#8217;s worth of classifications and I&#8217;ve kind of lost interest in learning how to make the categories work for me this way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Willis</title>
		<link>http://blog.rescuetime.com/2009/06/29/death-of-a-feature-the-impending-demise-of-tags/#comment-1385</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 03:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rescuetime.com/?p=217#comment-1385</guid>
		<description>So if I previously had nine apps tagged as &quot;art&quot; (photoshop, flash, maya, premiere pro and certain reference websites like www.flickr.com) how do I add up all the time I spent on &quot;art&quot; under the new system?

And does it now mean that all &quot;Internet Explorer&quot; activity is considered as one category?

Why not just track &quot;Phil is using his computer now&quot; and make one big category?

I don&#039;t get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So if I previously had nine apps tagged as &#8220;art&#8221; (photoshop, flash, maya, premiere pro and certain reference websites like <a href="http://www.flickr.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com</a>) how do I add up all the time I spent on &#8220;art&#8221; under the new system?</p>
<p>And does it now mean that all &#8220;Internet Explorer&#8221; activity is considered as one category?</p>
<p>Why not just track &#8220;Phil is using his computer now&#8221; and make one big category?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://blog.rescuetime.com/2009/06/29/death-of-a-feature-the-impending-demise-of-tags/#comment-1374</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rescuetime.com/?p=217#comment-1374</guid>
		<description>Love the new rescue time interface. simple - tells me what i need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the new rescue time interface. simple &#8211; tells me what i need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Major Release: Time to Put out some Fires! &#171; RescueTime Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.rescuetime.com/2009/06/29/death-of-a-feature-the-impending-demise-of-tags/#comment-1372</link>
		<dc:creator>Major Release: Time to Put out some Fires! &#171; RescueTime Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 02:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rescuetime.com/?p=217#comment-1372</guid>
		<description>[...] are officially gone. We broke down our reasoning here if you&#8217;re [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are officially gone. We broke down our reasoning here if you&#8217;re [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sergio R. Téllez</title>
		<link>http://blog.rescuetime.com/2009/06/29/death-of-a-feature-the-impending-demise-of-tags/#comment-1370</link>
		<dc:creator>Sergio R. Téllez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 01:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rescuetime.com/?p=217#comment-1370</guid>
		<description>Is there going to be the possibility to embed a top categories chart to my web site when tags are gone? 
It´s the only reason for me to use tags right now. 

thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there going to be the possibility to embed a top categories chart to my web site when tags are gone?<br />
It´s the only reason for me to use tags right now. </p>
<p>thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Landon</title>
		<link>http://blog.rescuetime.com/2009/06/29/death-of-a-feature-the-impending-demise-of-tags/#comment-1369</link>
		<dc:creator>Landon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 04:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rescuetime.com/?p=217#comment-1369</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a little curious as to the reasoning behind your crazy new url structure. (You know that no one but the nerds that appreciate mod_rewrite are going to utilize it...)

Why not do something like /browse/scores/by_day/for_week/2009-05-17/? Seems a bit overkill to have article-adjectives in a url, but that&#039;s just me ;)

Anyway, keep up the good work. I, like the masses, agree that a one-to-many (or :has_and_belongs_to_many) categorization structure doesn&#039;t need both tags and categories. Way to fight the web 2.0 mantra; tagging != life. :P

Thanks,
Landon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a little curious as to the reasoning behind your crazy new url structure. (You know that no one but the nerds that appreciate mod_rewrite are going to utilize it&#8230;)</p>
<p>Why not do something like /browse/scores/by_day/for_week/2009-05-17/? Seems a bit overkill to have article-adjectives in a url, but that&#8217;s just me <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Anyway, keep up the good work. I, like the masses, agree that a one-to-many (or :has_and_belongs_to_many) categorization structure doesn&#8217;t need both tags and categories. Way to fight the web 2.0 mantra; tagging != life. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Landon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Smith</title>
		<link>http://blog.rescuetime.com/2009/06/29/death-of-a-feature-the-impending-demise-of-tags/#comment-1368</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rescuetime.com/?p=217#comment-1368</guid>
		<description>Do us Solo Pro users get to experience the new drop down menus?  Or is this reserved for the world of Pulse and Empower users...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do us Solo Pro users get to experience the new drop down menus?  Or is this reserved for the world of Pulse and Empower users&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
