<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alert: RescueTime is no longer supporting Internet Explorer 6</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.rescuetime.com/2008/12/15/alert-rescuetime-is-no-longer-supporting-internet-explorer-6/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.rescuetime.com/2008/12/15/alert-rescuetime-is-no-longer-supporting-internet-explorer-6/</link>
	<description>Our official blog, where we discuss product updates, general productivity tips, and interesting tidbits from our hundreds of millions of hours of attention data.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 04:10:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Qrystal</title>
		<link>http://blog.rescuetime.com/2008/12/15/alert-rescuetime-is-no-longer-supporting-internet-explorer-6/#comment-1049</link>
		<dc:creator>Qrystal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 23:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rescuetime.com/?p=109#comment-1049</guid>
		<description>I am curious about what percentage of your users access the site using Google Chrome.  I am one of them, and I&#039;ve never struggled with anything on your site. Indeed, like many other sites, Chrome makes the experience faster and smoother.  Is it something you test, or is it working well because of its own design?  Just curious. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am curious about what percentage of your users access the site using Google Chrome.  I am one of them, and I&#8217;ve never struggled with anything on your site. Indeed, like many other sites, Chrome makes the experience faster and smoother.  Is it something you test, or is it working well because of its own design?  Just curious. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
